January 25, 2025

Maximize Office Insights

Easier Work, Maximum Results

JPMorgan Rejects Transition-Finance Trend Gripping Wall Street

JPMorgan Rejects Transition-Finance Trend Gripping Wall Street

(Bloomberg) — JPMorgan Chase & Co. is turning its back on a trend that’s been embraced by many of its Wall Street peers.

Most Read from Bloomberg

Transition finance — a term intended to describe the allocation of capital to activities that will ultimately help cut carbon emissions in the wider economy — exists in something of a regulatory gray zone. At the same time, financing corporate decarbonization has been identified as a huge business area, with Apollo Global Management Inc. recently suggesting the energy transition may represent a $50 trillion investment opportunity in the decades to come.

Against that backdrop, some of Wall Street’s biggest banks are designing transition-finance frameworks to define eligible assets and activities. Lenders include Wells Fargo & Co. and Citigroup Inc., according to public documents and people familiar with the process who asked not to be identified because they’re not authorized to speak on the subject.

JPMorgan, meanwhile, is opting out.

Linda French, JPMorgan’s global head of sustainability policy and regulation, says it’s far from clear that calling something a transition asset will unlock capital. Ultimately, she says, the approach ignores the fact that investors are less concerned with definitions and more interested in proof that capital allocations yield results.

“To state what should be obvious, finance will only move when there’s an economically viable business case,” French said in an interview. “Taxonomies and disclosure frameworks on their own do nothing to finance flows, and even risk becoming a distraction.”

French says the problem with transition-finance frameworks is similar to the hurdles that the narrower and more clearly defined arena of green assets has faced.

“Fundamentally, it’s a rehash of the green finance conversation: Once you’ve defined relevant economic activities, then finance will begin to flow to those activities,” she said. As an approach, it downplays the fundamentals of financial logic, she said.

It’s a conversation that feeds into an increasingly tense backdrop for climate finance. Pure green investments such as solar and wind have largely proved a losing bet in recent years, with the S&P Global Clean Energy Index down almost 40% since the beginning of 2023. In the same period, the S&P 500 Index has gained more than 50%.

Then there’s the political environment. President-elect Donald Trump has made clear he views green policies with deep skepticism — even calling climate change a “hoax” — and has pledged to wind back Biden-era incentives.

link